What's The Matter With Health Insurance?
Doesn't "Health Insurance" Mean Equitable Distribution of Resources?
Why is it that people with diabetes
(PWD) have a hard time getting
enough glucose test strips per month
covered by their medical insurance?
Or insulin pens? Or Byetta? Or Symlin?
And why is it next to impossible to get
insurance coverage for a continuous
glucose monitor (CGM)? Why is it that
we have to beg, plead, appeal and fight
for the FDA approved, and clinically
proven drugs and devices, that will help
us deal most effectively with this chronic
condition and reduce, or eliminate our
chances for end-stage, expensive and life
threatening complications? Why is it that
trying to get approval to see a dietitian,
an exercise physiologist or a CDE is so
difficult? I hate to be so cynical, but the
answer is that insurance companies do not
want to pay for these therapies because
they take away from their bottom line.
The way money is spent by most
insurance companies to take
care of PWD
is all backwards. Over 125 billion dollars
is spent annually to care for PWD and the
vast majority of that money goes into
treating end-stage complications in
hospitals (heart attacks, strokes, kidney
failure and amputations). Only 13% is
spent on medications and durable medical
goods (e.g., syringes, strips, meters,
insulin pumps, CGMs). The point is that
insurance companies put up big restrictions
on relatively inexpensive items that
would save tons of money down the road.
When a PWD comes to the hospital with
a horrible infection on a neuropathic foot,
health insurance seems to have no trouble
paying the surgeon's hefty bill to have the
foot amputated. On the other hand, a $30
visit to a dietitian for the same PWD to
learn how to cook and eat foods that
will help balance his blood sugar
with his medications is commonly
not covered or is denied because it is
deemed "unnecessary" by the health
care plan. This is infuriating to me
as a physician and as a PWD.
I do not want you to think that all
insurance companies are bad and evil 'Darth Vader' types. I know of several
health care plans that are run by
responsible and caring professionals
who try to do the right thing for their
clients. It's no secret that the cost of
health care is skyrocketing and all
insurance companies need to be
smart about the dollars they spend.
Pharmaco-economics is a term that
refers to finding the most economic
way to supply medications and other
services to large
groups of people.
For example, there
are multiple statin
drugs available for
people with high
cholesterol. They all work very
similarly and are a relatively homogenous
group of drugs. It makes sense
for an insurance company to bargain
for the least expensive one and offer
it to their customers. No one has a
huge argument with this cost saving
strategy.
However, there is a problem
when a patient with type 1 diabetes
suffering from a long history of hypoglycemia
unawareness gets turned
down for a life-saving, physician prescribed
continuous glucose
monitor. There
is a problem when a newly diagnosed
person with type 2 diabetes, who gets
an average of 7 minutes with her
doctor at each annual visit, is denied
an appointment with a certified
diabetes educator who could actually
spend the time to truly help her deal
with the disease. Insurance companies
seem to have snuck into the position
of making medical decisions for
people--overruling both the physicians
and individuals on aspects of
health.
There are
numerous
roadblocks to
ensuring that
PWD are covered
for the tools and medications they
need. They all seem to be designed
to discourage a physician from prescribing
what is known to be the best
for patients. Even when patients go
through the appropriate steps with
referrals and prescriptions and are
armed with statements of medical
necessity from their physicians,
insurance companies still seem to
delay any payment until PWD and
their caregivers flood the insurance
company with phone calls, letters
and other appeal process requirements.
These barriers to receiving the medications and services you
(the PWD) need continually beat
down an already harassed, busy and
overloaded caregiver, and of course,
you.
Caregivers and PWD who have
been turned down for medications,
devices and services that will help to
provide a healthier life with diabetes
need to voice the reality
of our situation. Helping us get the
tools we need today will likely help
us avoid costly, end stage
complications in the future.
Diabetes is not an uncommon
condition, nor is it an inexpensive
one. It is too bad that quality of
life is never put into the pharmacoeconomic
equation, because if it
were, there would be no senseless
arguments and stonewalling, and
PWD would get what they need
in order to take control of their
diabetes. Education and access to
good care, technologies and
medications must improve.
NOTE: Please see the new chapter on
legal issues by Kriss Halpern in the recently
released 3rd edition of the TCOYD book. |